"Shakespeare and His Critics" Logo with Ophelia by Meredith Dillman

Now located at:
http://shakespearean.org.uk/

All sources Transcribed and Edited
by Thomas Larque

Hello and Welcome to the "Shakespeare and His Critics" page. From this page, I hope to offer you access to a wide and increasing range of Shakespeare related documents.

To skip to documents on a particular character, play, or subject please click on the bookmarks below.

Historical Sources

OpheliaHamlet - Shylock  - Female Characters - Performance - Other Writers

Modern Criticism
and Information

Elizabethan Theatre - Ophelia Bibliography - Toby Belch - Shakespearean Theses - Masters Degrees

Thomas Larque (site editor) - Dedication


COPYRIGHT - All editions of works published on this website are, unless otherwise stated, Copyright © Thomas Larque and may not be duplicated without permission. People are free to print out these works for personal use or for small scale teaching purposes. However these works may not be republished on another webpage (link to them instead) or republished in any form other than a straightforward computer print-out of the webpage for personal use or small scale teaching purposes. These works may not be sold on in any form, whether printed or electronic. All illustrations on this website are Copyrighted by their Artist, unless otherwise stated.

THANKS - To Meredith Dillman for the "Shakespeare and His Critics" logo with her painting of Ophelia which appears on all my pages. She is a very talented artist whose beautiful creations can be seen at http://www.meredithdillman.com . Pay her a visit!  Visitors to this website may be particularly interested in her new picture of Ophelia (art noveau style), which can be seen at http://www.meredithdillman.com/art/prints/ophelia_artnouveau.html .


1 . Helena Faucit's Letter / Essay on Ophelia

... was written by the acclaimed 19th Century actress, Helena Faucit (Lady Martin by marriage). Helena Faucit acted with Macready at Covent Garden and Drury Lane, and toured with him internationally. Her letter on Ophelia offers a perceptive and lively interpretation of Ophelia's role within the play - but her digressions provide just as much interest. We get a glimpse of her childhood, a chance to lurk backstage during one of Macready's international tours, and can watch a Victorian actress developing her character for performance.

2. Anna Jameson's Essay on Ophelia

... published in her book "Shakspeare's Heroines"; originally known as "Characteristics of Women, Moral, Poetical and Historical" (1832). This was the very first book-length examination of Shakespeare's female characters, and can be said to have been the origin of all subsequent study of Shakespeare's women as a topic in themselves.

3. Mary Cowden Clarke's fictional Girlhood of Ophelia

... written by an acclaimed Victorian Shakespearean. This fictionalised account of Ophelia's childhood is a good example of the sort of character-based study that was popular in the Victorian period. This common Victorian portrayal of Ophelia regarded her as an innocent, who had certainly not had a sexual relationship with Hamlet, and who had learned the bawdy songs that she sings in her mad scene from her childhood stay with a vulgar peasant family who looked after her during her noble parents absence.

4. Ophelia Bibliography by Thomas Larque

... A working draft of an Ophelia Bibliography (produced by me, Thomas Larque) listing books, articles, essays, dissertations, plays, novels and poems centred on the character of Ophelia from Shakespeare's Hamlet.  Additions, corrections and suggestions are welcome.  If you have published, read, or seen anything performed about Ophelia that is not included in the Bibliography then please let me know. 

5 . William Hazlitt's Essay on Hamlet

... (first published in Characters of Shakespear's Plays in 1817). Brimming with enthusiasm, Hazlitt's essay has been hugely influential and is still as thought-provoking and informative today.

6. Samuel Taylor Coleridge's Lecture on Hamlet

... delivered in 1818 and collected by Thomas Ashe. Coleridge was a great poet himself and his criticism of Shakespeare has long been admired. He has been called the finest critic of the romantic period and the father of much 20th Century criticism.

7. Samuel Taylor Coleridge's 'Table Talk' on Hamlet

... very short notes on Hamlet, Polonius and Hamlet with Ophelia. Taken as extracts from Coleridge's "Table Talk".

8. Samuel Johnson's Notes on Hamlet

... edited by Sir Walter Raleigh. Johnson is famous as the creator of the first complete English Dictionary. He was also a significant editor of Shakespeare's plays, and his notes on the plays are highly regarded. His judgements sometimes seem odd to modern readers - he so hated the unhappy ending of King Lear, for example, that he refused to read it again until he was forced to - but he makes some satisfying points.

9. 'All The Year Round' Essay on "The Origin of Hamlet"

... taken from the 8th February 1879 edition of Charles Dickens's journal "All The Year Round". This is mainly a discussion of The Hystorie of Hamblet, an anonymous English novel based on Belleforest and Saxo Grammaticus, which may have been used as a source for Shakespeare's Hamlet . At the end of the essay, however, are some comments on the costuming and production style of some 19th Century Hamlets.

10. 'The Theatre' Essay on "Shylock in Germany"

... published in two parts in January and February 1880 editions of "The Theatre" magazine. This essay discusses the various German Shylocks of the 18th and 19th Centuries, but also includes an interesting digression into the difference between the German and British interest in Shakespeare in the 1880s. Despite being determinedly patriotic, the English author is forced to admit that Shakespeare is less popular and less frequently produced in his home country than he is in "the Fatherland", and that German critics publish a larger body of criticism on Shakespeare than do their British equivalents. Nevertheless, he argues that the quality of the English language criticism is suitably superior.

11.  William Richardson's Essay "On Shakespeare's Imitation of Female Characters"

... first published in 1788.  The first ever detailed examination of Shakespeare's female characters to be published.  Richardson attempts to defend Shakespeare from accusations that his female characters are too similar to each other, and less interesting and less well portrayed than his men.  Richardson argues that Shakespeare is justified in producing less varied female characters, since real women show less diversity of character and occupation than men.  In trying to show the artistic value of Shakespeare's women, he concentrates upon the "propriety" and "discrimination" of their characters, arguing that they show proper female reserve and delicacy.  The disdain for Shakespeare's female characters to which Richardson was responding is probably at least partly explained by the change in attitudes that accompanied the introduction of female actors in the mid-seventeenth century.  Shakespeare's plays were considered old fashioned, since their female parts were written for boys playing supporting roles, while the more modern playwrights wrote specifically for female actors and audiences with more interest in leading female parts.  Richardson particularly discusses Miranda, Isabella, Beatrice, Portia, and Cordelia.

12.  Alfred Darbyshire's address on "The Calvert Revivals"

... delivered to the Arts Club, Manchester in 1893. This intriguing and enjoyable lecture details the "Revivalist" productions of the Victorian period - by Kean, Phelps, Calvert and Irving. These productions were characterised by a huge expense of money and time, culminating in Calvert and Irving's detailed research into their productions. Calvert's Merchant of Venice , for example, warranted a research trip to Italy and the purchase of an authentic gondola, while research for his Henry V settled some previously unsolved questions about the heraldry of the battle. Darbyshire describes some aspects of these productions, and their preparation, in loving detail and gives a real insight into the spectacular scale and logistics of the "Revivalist" productions, with their casts of hundreds. Darbyshire was an Architect, and amateur actor, and designed a significant number of theatres - working closely with Henry Irving.

13 . Samuel Daniel's Delia and The Complaint of Rosamond

... Samuel Daniel's sonnets and narrative poem (published in 1592) had a strong influence upon Shakespeare's writing, especially his Sonnets. [External link - My old-spelling transcription of Daniel's poetry is on the Renascence Editions Website].


14. Lecture on Elizabethan Theatre [including Shakespeare] - by Thomas Larque

... An introductory lecture and overview on Elizabethan Theatre that I gave (as a specialist guest lecturer) for BTEC in Performing Arts students in 2001.  The lecture deals with the following topics: Drama before theatres, the first Theatre, the Globe, the players, the playwrights, politics and religion, costume, scenery and effects, performance techniques, and further reading.

15 . Directory of Shakespearean Theses: 1990-2006 - by Thomas Larque

... A Directory of British Doctoral and Research Masters theses on Shakespearean subjects from 1990-2006, by me, Thomas Larque.  Published on the British Shakespeare Association website.  Includes a statistical summary of the number of Shakespearean Doctoral theses produced each year in this period, and the number of Shakespearean Doctoral theses produced by each University.

16 . A Directory of Shakespearean and Early Modern Masters Degrees - by Thomas Larque

... A Directory of Masters Degrees offered by British Universities with a Shakespearean or Early Modern subject or named pathway.  Lists Masters degrees in Shakespeare, Early Modern History, Early Modern Literature, and Interdisciplinary Early Modern Studies.

17 . Toby Belch: A Reading of the role by a Youth Theatre actor for Spotlites Theatre Company - by Thomas Larque

... An actor's description of his performance reading of the role of Toby Belch in a production by Spotlites Theatre Company, written by me, Thomas Larque.  Please note that I wasn't very old when I played this role, nor even when I wrote this description of it.



Thomas Larque, webmaster and editor of the Shakespeare and His Critics website, is an academic theatre reviewer, writing for Shakespeare Bulletin , Research Opportunities in Medieval and Renaissance Drama (both international scholarly journals based in the United States), and Early Modern Literary Studies (an online scholarly journal based in Britain).  Some of his reviews have also been reprinted in the Shakespearean Criticism series.  In the past, he has been a member of the Executive Committee of the British Shakespeare Association (writing book and film reviews for the British Shakespeare Association Newsletter), has been a guest lecturer on Elizabethan Theatre for BTEC in Performing Arts students as part of their course, edited Samuel Daniel's Delia and The Complaint of Rosamond for Renascence Editions, and worked for many years as a theatre administrator, press and publications officer, and researcher for Spotlites Theatre Company of Chatham, acting for them in amateur productions and theatre-in-education (his only Shakespearean role being Toby Belch in Twelfth Night).  He is currently a "mature" student at the University of Kent in England.  Click here for a list of his publications.

E-Mail: shakespearean@shakespearean.org.uk


GOOGLE RANKINGS:  The Google search engine ranks sites on the number of links that they attract from other sites, and the respective popularity of the sites which link to them.  The idea is that if a lot of important sites think that your site is worth reading, then you must also be an important site.  On this basis, it is very pleasing to find that Shakespeare and His Critics (this site) is - at the time of writing, on 1 October 2004 - in Google.co.uk's top ten British sites for the search term "Shakespeare" and the search term "Hamlet", and in the top five British sites for the search term "Ophelia" (when all pages from the same site are counted as part of that single site, in both cases).  In international terms Google.com lists the site among the top thirty-five sites in the world for the search term "Ophelia", among the top sixty-five sites in the world for the search term "Hamlet", and just outside the top hundred sites in the world for the search term "Shakespeare" (ranked 103 at the time of writing).  For a small personal site, this isn't bad going.  My rivals and superiors in the top ten British "Shakespeare" rankings, for example, are such luminaries as the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust, the reconstructed Shakespeare's Globe Theatre, the Royal Shakespeare Company, the British Library's online scans of Shakespearean Quartos, large Stratford tourist sites, and the company that makes Shakespeare fishing rods.

GOOGLE RANKINGS 2 (update): The Google rankings move up and down as new sites appear and old sites gain or lose links.  I couldn't possibly keep continual track of my current position, as it would take all of my time, and I would almost always be out of date anyway.  I will, however, occasionally visit and will keep track of the highest points that I reach.  Top points reached to date (and the date at which I originally noticed them at that level) are:  UK 'Toby Belch' Search - 1 (30 March 2005), UK 'Ophelia' Search - 1 (10 April 2005), UK 'Shylock' Search - 2 (30 March 2005), UK 'Hamlet' Search - 2 (12 November 2005), UK 'Elizabethan Theatre' Search - 5 (9 December 2006), UK 'Shakespeare' Search - 10 (1 October 2004), World 'Toby Belch' Search - 1 (30 March 2005), World 'Shylock' Search - 5 (30 March 2005), World 'Hamlet' Search - 12 (9 December 2006), World 'Elizabethan Theatre' Search - 13 (9 December 2006), World 'Ophelia' Search - 3 (17 April 2008), World 'Shakespeare' Search - 37 (9 December 2006).  Remember that pages from the same site are counted as one site in these figures.  Doubtless some of these figures will eventually start to go down, but they are equally likely to come back up again afterwards.

If you have any comments on this site, or would like more information about any of the writers or sources that appear on it, please E-Mail me at shakespearean@shakespearean.org.uk . I will also do my best to answer more general questions about Shakespeare, but may not always have the time.  If you need help with school or university work, please note that I am not willing to write essays for you or answer simple homework questions that people are simply too lazy to do themselves, but I may sometimes be able to help if you need access to genuinely obscure or difficult to find information (if my library is up to the task).


NOTE ON SPELLING - Unless otherwise mentioned these texts are produced with their original spellings intact. This means, for example, that Hazlitt's essay on Hamlet refers to "Shakespear" and Coleridge's lecture to "Shakspere". These are not mistakes. Shakespeare's name was spelled in many different ways during the Renaissance (including at the most extreme "Shagspere", "Shexpere" and "Shaxberd"), Shakespeare himself, in his surviving signatures, spelled his name "Shakspere" or "Shakspeare", and the modern fixed spelling ("Shakespeare") was not considered to be the only correct one until some time into the 20th Century. For more information see Dave Kathman's page on the Renaissance Spelling and Pronounciation of Shakespeare's name [External link].